Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Jain Tinu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Jain Tinu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable non-elected politician with no significant coverage in reliable sources and current sources do not establish independent notability. The prod was removed by the blocked author or one of their socks using an IP address. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete does not meet inclusion criteria at this time. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet notability criteria. Regards, --Titodutta (talk) 19:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. TheEditster (talk) 06:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Training director of a political party's youth wing" is not a claim of encyclopedic notability at all, and he would have to be referenced a hell of a lot better than this to clear WP:NPOL #2 for serving on a city council. What is it with all these articles about minor Indian political party apparatchiks? Bearcat (talk) 15:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG --SalmanZ (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per @Bearcat:'s question. Recently a now-banned editor admitted to being an employee of the Bharatiya Janata Party's IT Department and that it is part of his job to update BJP member's articles, although I'm sure that they also have created a decent number of these as well. It's very possible that most of these articles on non-notable BJP party members are part of a wider promotional initiative. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.